Skip to content

Ask the SI:

Experiments / SPICE flow duct

BASSA spacecraft fire-safety study

Burning and Suppression of Solids

Burned small solid samples in a fan-driven duct to see how real materials burn without gravity, and whether a nitrogen jet puts them out.

NASA's own record
An astronaut works with both arms inside the glovebox on the space station.
Astronaut Don Pettit runs a BASS session in the glovebox, March 2012. NASA photograph iss030e178648.

What burned

Solid materials

Acrylic plastic, cotton fabric, wax and 2 more

Where

On the space station

In orbit, where everything is weightless

How much data

121 tests

Each one is a row in NASA's table

What they changed between tests

  • sample material
  • sample shape and size
  • flow direction
  • flow speed
  • nitrogen suppressant

What it found

  1. 1 of 2

    NASA's materials screening test is run at normal gravity and does not account for low-gravity behaviour.

    NASA's words

    “Current NASA spacecraft materials selection is based on a standard test method (NASA–STD–6001 Test 1) that segregates material based on 1-g behavior without consideration of low gravity effects.” PSI record

  2. 2 of 2

    The working hypothesis is that, with ventilation, a material burns at least as well in microgravity as on Earth.

    NASA's words

    “materials in microgravity, with adequate ventilation, burn as well if not better than the same material in normal gravity” PSI record

Summarized by the SI. Each summary is tied to a quotation that the build checks against NASA's text. A matching quote is not a scientific review.

What it helps with

  • Stopping a fire from starting

    Which materials burn, and in what air

    A main aim

  • Noticing a fire early

    What smoke looks like to a detector

    Not an aim

  • Putting a fire out

    What makes a flame go out

    A main aim

For researchers: NASA's full recordThe conditions tested, every row of the table, NASA's description, publications and hardware
ISSMicrogravity InvestigationSPICE flow ductCompare with othersdoi:10.60555/58h4-dy80

Shared hardware: One small fan-driven wind tunnel, built for SPICE, was reused for solids and for jet flames. Experiments that shared hardware share its limits, so their results can be compared directly.

Why it counts as fire-safety research

“Flammability studies focus on solid materials such as fabrics and plastics, as studied in the Burning and Suppression of Solids (BASS and BASS-II) and Spacecraft Fire Safety Demonstration (Saffire-I, -II, and -III) investigations.” NASA challenge statement

NASA's words behind each rating

  • Prevention3 of 3

    “Begin to bridge the gap between the normal gravity NASA-STD-6001 Test#1 method, ground-based microgravity tests, and actual material flammability in microgravity.”

  • Detection0 of 3

    Not an aim of this investigation.

  • Suppression3 of 3

    “Assess the effectiveness of an inert, gaseous extinguishing agent (similar to that used on ISS) in putting out flames over different materials, geometries, preheating, and flow.”

Conditions covered

Oxygen in the atmosphere
15.9% to 22.7%
Pressure
98.3 kPa to 102 kPa
Flow speed
0 to 44 cm/s
Itemized rows
121
121 tests

Fuels and materials

PMMA (78), SIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass) (12), Japan wax (10), Paraffin wax (7), Nomex (6), Wax (6), Ultem (2)

Measurements named in the PSI record

  • Radiometry
  • Flow velocity

How the tests differ, and how they are the same

Worked out from the 121 rows of the PSI table. A variable that is not listed was not reported, which is different from being held fixed.

Changed from test to test

Oxygen
15.9% to 22.7%
Pressure
98.3 kPa to 102 kPa
Flow speed
0 cm/s to 44 cm/sreported in 95 of 121 rows
Fuel or material
7 different values
Geometry
5 different valuesreported in 101 of 121 rows
Characteristic size
10 mm to 20 mmreported in 47 of 121 rows
Sample width
1 cm to 2 cmreported in 36 of 121 rows
Ignited
2 different valuesreported in 42 of 121 rows
How the test ended
5 different valuesreported in 69 of 121 rows

The same in every test

Fuel phase
solid

Reported for only some rows, with one value: flow direction.

Rows from the PSI table

Click a row for the source of every value. Filter and export

RecordTypeFuel or materialShapeOxygenPressureFlow, cm/sOutcomeDate
Test 1TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet22.1%98.3 kPa5 to 10burned to completion2012-03-30
Test 42TestPMMAsphere22.1%98.3 kPa3 to 102012-03-30
Test 18TestPMMAsphere22.1%98.3 kPa3 to 10flow terminated2012-03-30
Test 7TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet21.9%98.3 kPa102012-04-05
Test 8TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet21.9%98.3 kPa52012-04-05
Test 43TestPMMAsphere21.7%99.3 kPa6 to 102012-04-09
Test 44TestPMMAsphere21.7%99.3 kPa2 to 102012-04-09
Test 45TestPMMAsphere21.7%99.3 kPa1 to 10extinction2012-04-09
Test 19TestPMMAsphere21.9%100 kPa6flow terminated2012-05-02
Test 20TestPMMAsphere21.9%100 kPa0 to 6flow terminated2012-05-02
Test 21TestPMMAsphere21.9%100 kPaburned to completion2012-05-02
Test 4TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet21.6%99.7 kPa222012-05-10
Test 10TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet21.6%99.7 kPa112012-05-10
Test 12TestNomexfabric sheet21.6%99.7 kPa15did not ignite2012-05-10
Test 54TestPMMA21.7%99.7 kPa11extinction2012-05-11
Test 55TestPMMA21.7%99.7 kPa6.5flow terminated2012-05-11
Test 56TestPMMA21.7%99.7 kPa3.5 to 6flow terminated2012-05-11
Test 57TestPMMA21.7%99.7 kPaextinction2012-05-11
Test 110TestPMMA21.7%99.7 kPa6.5 to 21flow terminated2012-05-11
Test 30TestPMMA21.2%98.5 kPa5.52012-06-05
Test 31TestPMMA21.2%98.5 kPa2 to 6extinction2012-06-05
Test 32TestPMMA21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 5extinction2012-06-05
Test 33TestPMMA21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 52012-06-05
Test 12-RTestNomexfabric sheet21.2%98.5 kPa9did not ignite2012-06-05
Test 12-R2TestNomexfabric sheet21.2%98.5 kPa9did not ignite2012-06-05
Test 46TestPMMAsphere21.2%99.9 kPa0 to 9.5flow terminated2012-06-11
Test 47TestPMMAsphere21.2%99.9 kPa0 to 92012-06-11
Test 48TestPMMAsphere21.2%99.9 kPa0 to 92012-06-11
Test 49TestPMMAsphere21.2%99.9 kPa0 to 9flow terminated2012-06-11
Test 22TestPMMAsphere20.9%100 kPa0 to 9.75flow terminated2012-06-14
Test 23TestPMMAsphere20.9%100 kPa0 to 10flow terminated2012-06-14
Test 24TestPMMAsphere20.9%100 kPa0 to 10flow terminated2012-06-14
Test 25TestPMMAsphere20.9%100 kPa4burned to completion2012-06-14
Test 58TestPMMAsphere21.7%98.9 kPa4 to 92012-06-18
Test 59TestPMMAsphere21.7%98.9 kPa0 to 112012-06-18
Test 60TestPMMAsphere21.7%98.9 kPa0 to 7flow terminated2012-06-18
Test 61TestPMMAsphere21.7%98.9 kPa2 to 6.5flow terminated2012-06-18
Test 5TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet22%98.9 kPa5.75extinction2012-06-28
Test 14TestNomexfabric sheet22%98.9 kPa14.5extinction2012-06-28
Test 66TestPMMAslab22%98.9 kPa4 to 10self-extinguished2012-06-28
Test 67TestPMMAslab22%98.9 kPa2012-06-28
Test 34TestPMMAsphere21.9%100 kPa0flow terminated2012-06-29
Test 35TestPMMAsphere21.9%100 kPa0burned to completion
Test 16TestUltemsheet21.9%100 kPa14.5did not ignite2012-06-29
Test 5bTestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet21.9%100 kPa10extinction2012-06-29
Test 6TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet22.2%100 kPa9burned to completion2012-07-03
Test 82TestWaxcandle22.2%100 kPaextinction2012-07-03
Test 82aTestWaxcandle22.2%100 kPaextinction2012-07-03
Test 82bTestWaxcandle22.2%100 kPa5burned to completion2012-07-03
Test 68TestPMMAslab22.2%100 kPa6self-extinguished2012-07-03
Test 69TestPMMAslab22.4%100 kPa10extinction2012-07-12
Test 111TestPMMAsphere22.4%100 kPa10flow terminated2012-07-12
Test 112TestPMMAsphere22.4%100 kPa10flow terminated2012-07-12
Test 113TestPMMAsphere22.4%100 kPa10extinction2012-07-12
Test 2TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet22.7%101 kPa9 to 442012-07-19
Test 3TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet22.7%102 kPa10 to 442012-07-19
Test 15TestNomexfabric sheet22.5%102 kPa30did not ignite2012-07-19
Test 13TestNomexfabric sheet22.5%102 kPa15extinction2012-07-19
Test 17TestUltemsheet22.5%102 kPa8extinction2012-07-19
Test 114TestPMMAsphere22.5%102 kPa6.52012-07-19
Test 62TestPMMAsphere22.6%102 kPa10 to 442012-07-23
Test 63TestPMMAsphere22.6%102 kPa102012-07-23
Test 64TestPMMAsphere22.6%102 kPa5blowoff2012-07-23
Test 65TestPMMAsphere22.6%102 kPa52012-07-23
Test 118TestPMMAsphere22.6%102 kPa2012-07-23
Test 11TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet21.5%100 kPa202012-08-09
Test 9TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet21.6%100 kPa10burned to completion2012-08-09
Test 102TestPMMAsphere21.6%100 kPa52012-08-09
Test 83aTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0extinction2012-08-16
Test 83bTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 22012-08-16
Test 83cTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 2burned to completion2012-08-16
Test 84aTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 2extinction2012-08-16
Test 84bTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 22012-08-16
Test 86aTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 2flow terminated2012-08-16
Test 86bTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 2flow terminated2012-08-16
Test 86cTestJapan waxcandle21.2%98.5 kPa0 to 1burned to completion2012-08-16
Test 70TestPMMAslab21.9%98.6 kPa7 to 92012-08-21
Test 71TestPMMAslab21.9%98.6 kPa92012-08-21
Test 74TestParaffin waxslab21.9%98.6 kPa3 to 5self-extinguished2012-08-21
Test 75TestParaffin waxslab21.9%98.6 kPa6did not ignite2012-08-21
Test 98TestPMMA17.1%98.3 kPa122013-04-05
Test 99TestPMMA17.1%98.3 kPa12extinction2013-04-05
Test 114TestPMMA21.1%99.5 kPa2 to 7.52013-04-09
Test 115TestPMMA21.1%99.5 kPa0 to 7.52013-04-09
Test 116TestPMMA21.1%99.5 kPa0 to 8flow terminated2013-04-09
Test 117TestPMMA21.1%99.5 kPaextinction2013-04-09
Test 117aTestPMMA21.1%99.5 kPa0 to 202013-04-09
Test 100TestPMMA21.1%99.3 kPa0 to 8extinction2013-04-12
Test 85TestParaffin waxcandle21.1%99.3 kPa32013-04-12
Test 93TestParaffin waxcandle21.1%99.3 kPaself-extinguished2013-04-12
Test 26TestPMMA17.3%100 kPa2013-04-16
Test 27TestPMMA17.1%100 kPaflow terminated2013-04-16
Test 28TestPMMA17.1%100 kPaburned to completion2013-04-16
Test 87TestJapan waxcandle15.9%98.3 kPa0 to 2extinction2013-04-23
Test 103TestPMMAsphere17.5%98.3 kPa5extinction2013-04-23
Test 104TestPMMAsphere17.5%98.3 kPaflow terminated2013-04-23
Test 105TestPMMAsphere20.5%98.3 kPaextinction2013-04-23
Test 38TestPMMAsphere16.7%98.9 kPa6 to 8extinction2013-04-26
Test 39TestPMMAsphere16.7%98.9 kPaself-extinguished2013-04-26
Test 40TestPMMAsphere17.8%98.9 kPa0 to 8burned to completion2013-04-26
Test 72TestPMMAslab21%98.9 kPa9did not ignite2013-04-26
Test 73TestPMMAslab21%98.9 kPa15did not ignite2013-04-26
Test 118TestPMMAsphere17.3%99.6 kPaextinction2013-04-29
Test 119TestPMMAsphere17.3%99.6 kPaflow terminated2013-04-29
Test 89TestParaffin waxcandle16.1%99.5 kPaextinction2013-05-02
Test 95TestParaffin waxcandle16.1%99.5 kPa5 to 10did not ignite2013-05-02
Test 92TestJapan waxcandle16.3%99.5 kPaburned to completion2013-05-02
Test 78TestParaffin waxslab16.3%99.5 kPaself-extinguished2013-05-02
Test 50TestPMMAsphere17.2%99 kPa52103-05-15
Test 51TestPMMAsphere17.2%99 kPa52013-05-15
Test 52TestPMMAsphere17.1%99 kPa0 to 102013-05-15
Test 53TestPMMAsphere17.1%99 kPa102013-05-15
Test 106TestPMMAsphere17.2%99.3 kPa2013-05-17
Test 107TestPMMAsphere17.2%99.3 kPa2013-05-17
Test 108TestPMMAsphere17.2%99.3 kPaextinction2013-05-17
Test 109TestPMMAsphere17.2%99.3 kPaextinction2013-06-01
Test 79TestWaxslab17.4%101 kPaextinction2013-06-01
Test 80TestWaxslab21.2%101 kPa10did not ignite2013-06-01
Test 75TestWaxslab21.2%101 kPa10did not ignite2013-06-01
Test 53TestPMMAsphere21.2%101 kPa2013-06-01
Test 53aTestPMMAsphere21.2%101 kPa2013-06-01
How the table was read, and what was repaired

BASS - solid-fuel burns

PSI-26_Experimental table_BASS.csv

122 rows in the file, 121 kept as records, 1 left out (A cleaning step). The PSI table lists the sample for each burn but not its oxygen, pressure or flow speed.

sha256 ccfc3c54d948b64a1c5d2596a63c7c8019e51df0c91a1d62f039f48fa28c300f · fetched 2026-11-11

Repairs and warnings

  • 1 row(s) are not tests and were left out: A cleaning step

NASA's description

Objectives

The two main objectives for BASS are to: 1.) Begin to bridge the gap between the normal gravity NASA-STD-6001 Test#1 method, ground-based microgravity tests, and actual material flammability in microgravity. The relation between these can be investigated by observing flames burning for the longer times available in flight. Practical, realistic (thicker) fuels in typical geometries will be examined, including wake flames which have characteristics of a fire burning behind another object (for example, a fire burning in tight area which may not be easily accessible). 2.) Assess the effectiveness of an inert, gaseous extinguishing agent (similar to that used on ISS) in putting out flames over different materials, geometries, preheating, and flow.

Approach

The experiment was conducted aboard the International Space Station (ISS) inside the Microgravity Glove Box (MSG). Custom-made fabric samples consisting of 75% cotton and 25% fiberglass (by mass) measuring were used as a fuel source as well as Nomex fabric and Ultem. A Kanthal wire (29-gage)igniter was used to initiate combustion at one end of the fabric. Airflow was controlled using a variable speed fan, with airflow speeds reaching as high as 40 cm/s. The airflow was directed along the fuel surface in either the opposed or concurrent direction. This investigation explored two primary air flow configurations; concurrent-flow and opposed-flow. With concurrent-flow air flows in the same direction as the flame spread and in opposed-flow air flows in the opposite direction of flame spread. Flames were observed in the top and edge profiles and data was collected on flame size, shape, color, spread rate, and potential flame quenching. The samples were placed in a small flow duct (76 mm x 76 mm cross section) that allowed for airflow across the fabric. Other sample shapes were utilized as well including spheres and cylinders.

Hypothesis

BASS experiments were based on the hypothesis that materials in microgravity, with adequate ventilation, burn as well if not better than the same material in normal gravity with other conditions being identical (pressure, oxygen concentration, temperature, etc.) To test this hypothesis with any but the thinnest materials requires extended microgravity time – longer than available in drop towers or parabolic aircraft.

Research impacts and Earth benefits

Current NASA spacecraft materials selection is based on a standard test method (NASA–STD–6001 Test 1) that segregates material based on 1-g behavior without consideration of low gravity effects. A critical element of this understanding is the radiative heat emission from the flame. These results are used in first order models and predictions of heat release in spacecraft fires and as a means to extend heat release data from tests like the NASA cone calorimeter test (NASA–STD–6001 Test 2) to a performance-based material selection process. Using nitrogen as a flame suppressant in microgravity provides a direct link to current and planned extinguishment techniques. BASS results provide essential guidance to ground-based microgravity combustion research efforts. Detailed combustion models are validated using the simpler flow environment afforded by tests in microgravity. Once validated, they can be used to build more complex combustion models needed to capture the important details of flames burning in normal gravity. These models have wide applicability to the general understanding of many terrestrial combustion problems and will guide novel spacecraft design and ensure the safety of future crewed missions.

Publications

10 listed in PSI, 7 with a DOI.

  1. The Microgravity Science Glovebox as a Platform for Exploration Research on the International Space StationSpivey Reggie, Luz Paul
  2. Opposed-flow flame spread: A comparison of microgravity and normal gravity experiments to establish the thermal regimeBhattacharjee Subrata, Laue Matthew, Carmignani Luca, Ferkul Paul, Olson Sandra
  3. Simplified model for predicting difference between flammability limits of a thin material in normal gravity and microgravity environmentsTakahashi Shuhei, Ebisawa Tomoya, Bhattacharjee Subrata, Ihara Tadayoshi
  4. A Correlation for an Effective Flow Velocity for Capturing the Boundary Layer Effect in Opposed-Flow Flame Spread over Thin FuelsS Bhattacharjee, R Nagarkar, Y Nakamura
  5. Radiation signature in opposed-flow flame spreadBhattacharjee Subrata, Paolini Christopher P., Miller Fletcher, Nagarkar Rohit
  6. OS24-1 The Effect of Boundary Layer on Blow-Off Extinction in Opposed-Flow Flame Spread: Results of Experiments and Simplified Analysis(invited,Scale modeling on solid combustion,OS24 Scale modeling,FLUID AND THERMODYNAMICS)Bhattacharjee Subrata, Cartnignani Luca
Show the other 4
  1. Role of Gas Radiation in the Mechanism of Opposed-Flow Flame Spread in a Microgravity EnvironmentJR Villaraza, L Carmignani, S Bhattacharjee
  2. Thickness and Fuel Preheating Effects on Material Flammability in Microgravity from the BASS ExperimentP Ferkul, SL Olson, F Takahashi, M Endo, MC Johnston, JS Tien
  3. A novel apparatus for flame spread studyS Bhattacharjee, M Bundy, C Paolini, G Patel, W Tran.
  4. Opposed-Flow Flame Spread in a Narrow Channel Apparatus over Thin PMMA SheetsGR Bornand, FJ Miller, JM Pepper, SL Olson, IS Wichman

Hardware and raw data

164 GB of raw data on PSI: reports 2, raw data 173, metadata 1, presentations 6, science documents 5, engineering documents 24. FlameLens reads the experimental table, not the raw video or sensor files.

Linked investigations

On Earth

Material flammability standards: Radiative heat-release data feeds performance-based material selection and fire models.

“extend heat release data from tests like the NASA cone calorimeter test”