Skip to content

Ask the SI:

Experiments / ACME burners

CLD FlameBasic flame science

Coflow Laminar Diffusion Flame

Pushed methane and ethylene jet flames to their dilute and sooty extremes to give modellers benchmark data.

NASA's own record
An engineer looks closely at a gas burner inside the ACME hardware.
The gas-jet burner inside the ACME insert, inspected at NASA Glenn in June 2016. NASA photograph GRC-2016-C-05051.

What burned

Gas

Methane and ethylene

Where

On the space station

In orbit, where everything is weightless

How much data

32 test days

NASA's table lists days, each with several flames

What they changed between tests

  • fuel
  • fuel dilution
  • flow velocity

What it found

  1. NASA links this fundamental flame work to fire suppression through extinction physics.

    NASA's words

    “an understanding of those factors that affect flame extinction in diffusion flames is critical in the suppression of fires and in improving engine efficiency” PSI record

Summarized by the SI. Each summary is tied to a quotation that the build checks against NASA's text. A matching quote is not a scientific review.

What it helps with

  • Stopping a fire from starting

    Which materials burn, and in what air

    Not an aim

  • Noticing a fire early

    What smoke looks like to a detector

    Touches on it

  • Putting a fire out

    What makes a flame go out

    Touches on it

For researchers: NASA's full recordThe conditions tested, every row of the table, NASA's description, publications and hardware
ISSMicrogravity InvestigationACME burnersCompare with othersdoi:10.60555/23e1-9950

Shared hardware: Six gas-flame experiments shared one modular set of burners and diagnostics. Experiments that shared hardware share its limits, so their results can be compared directly.

Why it counts as fire-safety research

“Other combustion investigations within the PSI database (but not explicitly referenced above) are still relevant to fire safety, just not as strongly or directly.” NASA challenge statement

NASA's words behind each rating

  • Prevention0 of 3

    Not an aim of this investigation.

  • Detection1 of 3

    “Characterize the sooting tendencies of diffusion flames with long residence times”

  • Suppression1 of 3

    “an understanding of those factors that affect flame extinction in diffusion flames is critical in the suppression of fires”

Conditions covered

Oxygen in the atmosphere
not reported
not in the PSI table
Pressure
not reported
not in the PSI table
Flow speed
not reported
not in the PSI table
Itemized rows
32
32 test days

Fuels and materials

methane (16), ethylene (16)

Measurements named in the PSI record

  • Pyrometry
  • Chemiluminescence
  • Laser diagnostics
  • Soot measurement

How the tests differ, and how they are the same

Worked out from the 32 rows of the PSI table. A variable that is not listed was not reported, which is different from being held fixed.

Changed from test to test

Fuel or material
2 different values
Fuel fraction
0% to 100%
Flames ignited
2 to 18

The same in every test

Fuel phase
gas
Fuel diluent
N2
Geometry
coflow jet

Rows from the PSI table

Click a row for the source of every value. Filter and export

RecordTypeFuel or materialShapeOxygenPressureFlow, cm/sOutcomeDate
Day 17319Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2017-11-15
Day 17324Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2017-11-20
Day 17342Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2017-12-08
Day 17356Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2017-12-22
Day 18003Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-01-03
Day 18005Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-01-05
Day 18008Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-01-08
Day 18011Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-01-11
Day 18022Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-01-22
Day 18026Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-01-26
Day 18032Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-02-01
Day 18039Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-02-08
Day 18043Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-02-12
Day 18053Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-02-22
Day 18145Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-05-25
Day 18151Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-05-31
Day 18177Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-06-26
Day 18186Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-07-05
Day 18192Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-07-11
Day 18199Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-07-18
Day 18214Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-08-02
Day 18218Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-08-06
Day 18235Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-08-23
Day 18239Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-08-27
Day 18241Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-08-29
Day 18249Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-09-06
Day 18253Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-09-10
Day 18257Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2018-09-14
Day 21041Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2021-02-10
Day 21046Test dayethylenecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2021-02-15
Day 21050Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2021-02-19
Day 21062Test daymethanecoflow jetnot reportednot reported2021-03-03
How the table was read, and what was repaired

Coflow Laminar Diffusion Flame - test days

PSI-21_Experimental table_CLD Flame.csv

32 rows in the file, 32 kept as records. Session summary - one row per test day. Oxygen and pressure are not listed in the PSI table.

  • Test Day - includes the year as the first two digits followed by the 3-digit day of the year (where any late-hour transition to the next day is neglected). MFC - identifies the maximum flow rate of the specified ACME Mass Flow Controller (MFC) in slpm on a nitrogen basis. Fuel conc. - (as diluted with nitrogen on a volume basis) was varied between tests and sometimes during tests where the listing here accounts for both. However, it does not account for extinction that sometimes occurred before the flame fully reached the lowest concentration. Flames ignited is the number ignited on that test day.

sha256 9fafbc5b3dddaf715ce8025ed9154ce297803f7b69a935f077ec26c8249e44c0 · fetched 2026-11-11

Repairs and warnings

  • Column 'Fuel Bottle': 26 cell(s) were damaged by spreadsheet drag-fill (for example 40% CH5, 40% CH6, 40% CH7, 40% CH8, 40% CH9) and were restored to the first value of each run.

NASA's description

Objectives

In order to provide the experimental data needed to allow rigorous testing of computational models at the extremes of the fuel dilution spectrum, we have the following objectives: A) Characterize the behavior of weak coflow diffusion flames of methane and ethylene, as a function of velocity and fuel dilution, through measurement of flame shape, lift-off heights, temperatures and extinction limits. B) Characterize the sooting tendencies of diffusion flames with long residence times, as a function of velocity and fuel dilution, through measurement of flame shape, gas temperatures in the soot-free portion of the flame, soot luminosity, soot temperatures, and soot volume fractions.

Approach

ACME CLD Flame project goals include the generation of improved computational models with improved soot sub-models that are effective for both dilute flames and sooting flames that vary from low to high soot loading levels. The enhanced time and spatial scales in a microgravity environment will be important for achieving both goals. Experimentally, we plan to study methane and ethylene diffusion flames over a wide range of test conditions. For the more dilute flames, measurements will be made of flame chemiluminesence of OH* and CH* to observe variations in lift-off height and flame shape as extinction limits are approached. The sooting tendencies of the more fuel-rich flames will be investigated using soot luminosity and laser extinction measurements to determine soot temperatures and soot volume fractions. Flame temperatures in non-sooting regions will be measured using thin-filament pyrometry. Based on observations, modifications can be made to the kinetics and soot model to match better the experimental results. If the overall agreement of the measurements and computations is good, the results of the computations can be “mined” to provide insight on species (and hence chemical processes) that cannot be measured directly using the diagnostics available for the proposed experiment.

Hypothesis

This investigation was focused on gathering bench mark data to validate the hypothesis of computation models, the details of which are available within the following publications: 1) Smooke, M.D., Hall, R.J., Colket, M.B., Fielding, J., Long, M.B., McEnally, C.S., and Pfefferle, L.D., Investigation of the transition from lightly sooting towards heavily sooting co-flow ethylene diffusion flames. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2004. 8(3): p. 593-606. https://doi.org/10.1088/1364-7830/8/3/009 2) Luque, J., Jeffries, J.B., Smith, G.P., Crosley, D.R., Walsh, K.T., Long, M.B., and Smooke, M.D., CH(A-X) and OH(A-X) optical emission in an axisymmetric laminar diffusion flame. Combustion and Flame, 2000. 122(1/2): p. 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00112-7 3) Walsh, K.T., Fielding, J., Smooke, M.D., and Long, M.B., Experimental and computational study of temperature, species, and soot in buoyant and non-buoyant coflow laminar diffusion flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000. 28: p. 1973-1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80603-7 4) Walsh, K.T., Long, M.B., Tanoff, M.A., and Smooke, M.D., Experimental and computational study of CH, CH*, and OH* in an axisymmetric laminar diffusion flame. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 1998. 27(Vol. 1): p. 615-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80453-0

Research impacts and Earth benefits

Diffusion flames are the flame type of most practical combustion devices. The ability to predict the coupled effects of complex transport phenomena with detailed chemical kinetics in such systems is critical in the modeling of turbulent reacting flows and in understanding the processes by which soot formation and radiative transfer take place. In addition, an understanding of those factors that affect flame extinction in diffusion flames is critical in the suppression of fires and in improving engine efficiency. While normal gravity combustion studies can provide important information on combustion processes, the effects of gravitational forces often complicate the interpretation of both computational and experimental results. Momentum effects dominate most practical combustion devices, but the contribution of buoyancy forces is hard to eliminate in normal gravity. A goal of the study will be to apply sophisticated numerical tools and quantitative diagnostic techniques to the study of hydrocarbon diffusion flames in a microgravity environment. This will lead to a more detailed understanding of the interaction of convection, diffusion and chemistry under momentum-dominated conditions.

Publications

18 listed in PSI, 18 with a DOI.

  1. Analysis of CH* concentration and flame heat release rate in laminar coflow diffusion flames under microgravity and normal gravityD Giassi, S Cao, BA Bennett, DP Stocker, F Takahashi, MD Smooke, MB Long
  2. Signal-to-noise ratio improvements in laser flow diagnostics using time-resolved image averaging and high dynamic range imagingGiassi Davide, Long Marshall B.
  3. A computational and experimental study of coflow laminar methane/air diffusion flames: Effects of fuel dilution, inlet velocity, and gravityCao S., Ma B., Bennett B.A.V., Giassi D., Stocker D.P., Takahashi F., Long M.B., Smooke M.D.
  4. A Combined Experimental and Computational Study of Soot Formation in Normal and Microgravity ConditionsDobbins Richard R., Tinjero Jesse, Squeo Joseph, Zhao Xinyu, Hall Robert J., Colket Meredith B., Long Marshall B., Smooke Mitchell D.
  5. Constrained-temperature solutions of coflow laminar diffusion flamesKempema Nathan J., Dobbins Richard R., Long Marshall B., Smooke Mitchell D.
  6. Effects of pressure and fuel dilution on coflow laminar methane–air diffusion flames: A computational and experimental studyCao Su, Ma Bin, Giassi Davide, Bennett Beth Anne V., Long Marshall B., Smooke Mitchell D.
Show the other 12
  1. Effect of soot self-absorption on color-ratio pyrometry in laminar coflow diffusion flamesKempema Nathan J., Long Marshall B.
  2. A computational and experimental study of coflow laminar methane/air diffusion flames: Effects of fuel dilution, inlet velocity, and gravityCao S., Ma B., Bennett B.A.V., Giassi D., Stocker D.P., Takahashi F., Long M.B., Smooke M.D.
  3. An experimental and computational study of soot formation in a coflow jet flame under microgravity and normal gravityMa Bin, Cao Su, Giassi Davide, Stocker Dennis P., Takahashi Fumiaki, Bennett Beth Anne V., Smooke Mitchell D., Long Marshall B.
  4. Absolute light calibration using S-type thermocouplesMa Bin, Long Marshall B.
  5. A comparison of Raman signatures and laser-induced incandescence with direct numerical simulation of soot growth in non-premixed ethylene/air flamesHerdman Jennifer D., Connelly Blair C., Smooke Mitchell D., Long Marshall B., Miller J. Houston
  6. Soot and thin-filament pyrometry using a color digital cameraKuhn Peter B., Ma Bin, Connelly Blair C., Smooke Mitchell D., Long Marshall B.
  7. IMAGING FLAMES: FROM ADVANCED LASER DIAGNOSTICS TO SNAPSHOTSLONG MARSHALL
  8. A paradigm shift in the interaction of experiments and computations in combustion researchConnelly B.C., Bennett B.A.V., Smooke M.D., Long M.B.
  9. Computational and experimental investigation of the interaction of soot and NO in coflow diffusion flamesConnelly B.C., Long M.B., Smooke M.D., Hall R.J., Colket M.B.
  10. Distributed-memory parallel computation of a forced, time-dependent, sooting, ethylene/air coflow diffusion flameDworkin S. B., Cooke J. A., Bennett B. A.V., Connelly B. C., Long M. B., Smooke M. D., Hall R. J., Colket M. B.
  11. Measurements and calculations of formaldehyde concentrations in a methane/N2/air, non-premixed flame: Implications for heat release rateDworkin S.B., Schaffer A.M., Connelly B.C., Long M.B., Smooke M.D., Puccio M.A., McAndrew B., Miller J.H.
  12. Computational and experimental study of a forced, time-dependent, methane–air coflow diffusion flameDworkin S.B., Connelly B.C., Schaffer A.M., Bennett B.A.V., Long M.B., Smooke M.D., Puccio M.P., McAndrews B., Miller J.H.

Hardware and raw data

2 TB of raw data on PSI: experimental table 1. FlameLens reads the experimental table, not the raw video or sensor files.

On Earth

Cleaner combustion: Better soot and extinction models for practical burners and engines.

“Diffusion flames are the flame type of most practical combustion devices.”