Skip to content

Ask the SI:

Experiments / Smoke diagnostics

SAME-RA spacecraft fire-safety study

Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment - Reflight

Re-flew SAME with a new foam material, hotter and no-flow heating, and a better particle instrument.

NASA's own record
An astronaut works with her arm inside the glovebox on the space station.
Astronaut Shannon Walker works with the SAME hardware in the glovebox, July 2010. NASA photograph iss024e008351.

What burned

Solid materials

Wire insulation, silicone, cotton wick and 1 more

Where

On the space station

In orbit, where everything is weightless

How much data

109 tests

Each one is a row in NASA's table

What they changed between tests

  • sample material
  • airflow
  • heating temperature
  • smoke aging time

What it found

  1. 1 of 2

    SAME-R added tests with no airflow while the sample was heated - the case closest to a stagnant corner of a cabin.

    NASA's words

    “test conditions were broadened including higher heating temperatures and no-flow during sample heating time” PSI record

  2. 2 of 2

    The first flight's particle samples were contaminated, which is why the reflight exists.

    NASA's words

    “all the TEM grids were severely contaminated with some unidentified foreign particles” PSI record

Summarized by the SI. Each summary is tied to a quotation that the build checks against NASA's text. A matching quote is not a scientific review.

What it helps with

  • Stopping a fire from starting

    Which materials burn, and in what air

    Not an aim

  • Noticing a fire early

    What smoke looks like to a detector

    A main aim

  • Putting a fire out

    What makes a flame go out

    Not an aim

For researchers: NASA's full recordThe conditions tested, every row of the table, NASA's description, publications and hardware
ISSMicrogravity InvestigationSmoke diagnosticsCompare with othersdoi:10.60555/2np7-jv14

Shared hardware: Particle counters and smoke detectors; one of the instruments was first proven in a dust test. Experiments that shared hardware share its limits, so their results can be compared directly.

Why it counts as fire-safety research

“Fire detection was tested in microgravity through the Smoke and Aerosol Measurement Experiment studies (SAME and SAME-R).” NASA challenge statement

NASA's words behind each rating

  • Prevention0 of 3

    Not an aim of this investigation.

  • Detection3 of 3

    “the results from SAME-R can lead to technology for an advanced fire detector for future spacecraft that will be used for long duration missions”

  • Suppression0 of 3

    Not an aim of this investigation.

Conditions covered

Oxygen in the atmosphere
not reported
not in the PSI table
Pressure
not reported
not in the PSI table
Flow speed
0 to 8.1 cm/s
Itemized rows
109
109 tests

Fuels and materials

Kapton (29), Silicone (22), Lamp wick (20), Pyrell foam (20), Teflon (18)

Measurements named in the PSI record

  • Particle sizing
  • Aerosol counters

How the tests differ, and how they are the same

Worked out from the 109 rows of the PSI table. A variable that is not listed was not reported, which is different from being held fixed.

Changed from test to test

Flow speed
0 cm/s to 8.1 cm/s
Fuel or material
5 different values
Heater resistance ratio
1.22 to 1.48
Heating time
60 s to 120 sreported in 68 of 109 rows
Smoke aging time
21 s to 1,923 sreported in 104 of 109 rows
Smoke count mean diameter
0.049 µm to 1.1 µmreported in 105 of 109 rows
Smoke diameter of average mass
0.0305 µm to 1.22 µmreported in 105 of 109 rows

The same in every test

Fuel phase
solid
Geometry
heated sample (smoke source)

Rows from the PSI table

Click a row for the source of every value. Filter and export

RecordTypeFuel or materialShapeOxygenPressureFlow, cm/sOutcomeDate
Test 51TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 51aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 61TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 61aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 62TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 62aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 70TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 73TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 73aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 75TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 75aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 77TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 77aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 85TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 85aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 90TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 90aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 92TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 93TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 93aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 94TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 94aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 101TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 101aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 102TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 102aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 108TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported1
Test 108aTestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported1
Test 114TestKaptonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported2
Test 48TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8
Test 53TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 59TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 59aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 60TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 60aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 65TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 65aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 66TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 66aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 67TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 72TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 86TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 86aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 91TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 99TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 99aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 103TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported1
Test 103aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported1
Test 104TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 104aTestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 109TestSiliconeheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported2
Test 49TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8
Test 54TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 55TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 55aTestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 57TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 68TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 78TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 78aTestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 80TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 80aTestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 82TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 82aTestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 88TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 96TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 96aTestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 98TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 98aTestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 106TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 106aTestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 110TestLamp wickheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported2
Test 50TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 56TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 57TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 58TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 58aTestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 69TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 79TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 79aTestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 81TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 81aTestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 83TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 83aTestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 89TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 100TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 100aTestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 105TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 105aTestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 111TestTeflonheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported2
Test 52TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 63TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 63aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 64TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 64aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 71TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 74TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 74aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 76TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 76aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 84TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 84aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 87TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported8.1
Test 95TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 95aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 97TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 97aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported0
Test 107TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported1
Test 107aTestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported1
Test 113TestPyrell foamheated sample (smoke source)not reportednot reported2
How the table was read, and what was repaired

SAME-R - smoke tests

PSI-101_Experimental table_SAME-R.csv

109 rows in the file, 109 kept as records. Smoke-generation tests - samples are heated to produce smoke; there is no flame, so oxygen and pressure are not test variables.

sha256 87164b7dc9168a4273c159f7a9f23699afbd06ad97b77974377e79b9bf8a3bef · fetched 2026-11-11

NASA's description

Objectives

Similar to the original SAME investigation, the primary objective of the SAME-R investigation was to quantify the sizes that the liquid smoke particulate achieves in low gravity and to relate the droplet size distribution to the smoke generation and smoke transport conditions in the experiment. One of the problems encountered during the SAME investigation was that after the thermal precipitators were returned to the ground, it was found that all the TEM grids were severely contaminated with some unidentified foreign particles, making these grids unusable although some of them showed shapes of certain types of smoke particles. Based on that experience the SAME-R investigation employed several modification covering new materials, extended operating conditions, and diagnostic equipments.

Approach

SAME-R utilized the SAME hardware used on-orbit. Based on the experience gained from SAME, SAME-R included the following modifications: 1) a new test material, Pyrell®, an intumescent fire-retardant foam by Foamex, was introduced to replace DBP samples, 2) test conditions were broadened including higher heating temperatures and no-flow during sample heating time, and 3) a new instrument, M-pass, developed in-house GRC, was used to replace one of the two Commercial Diagnostic Enclosures that includes a DustTrak and an ionization detector used in SAME. SAME-R flight tests were conducted from July 16, to September 9, 2010, successfully completing 66 test points. After SAME-R flight tests, three major post–flight ground tests were performed to improve data reduction process and to validate the lognormal distribution assumption, the key to the moment method employed by SAME and SAME-R.

Hypothesis

The three hypotheses that motivated the original SAME investigation is also applicable for the reflight SAME-R investigation: In a μg environment, with the absence of the strong buoyancy-induced flows, smoke particle growth from a pyrolyzing/smoldering source, as a result of nucleation, condensation, and coagulation, will lead to larger particles compared to those produced in 1g. The formation of the larger particles is favored by the expected higher vapor concentration and smoke residence times near the source due to the reduced velocities and mixing at μg conditions. In particular, it is hypothesized that liquid aerosol smokes produced in microgravity will exhibit substantially larger droplet sizes than under the same conditions in normal gravity (with a corresponding decrease in the particle number density for the same mass of smoke). The change in the size distribution and number density will, in turn, affect the response of the smoke detectors and possibly result in some detectors not producing an alarm when exposed to this smoke.

Research impacts and Earth benefits

Along with the results from the original SAME investigation, the results from SAME-R can lead to technology for an advanced fire detector for future spacecraft that will be used for long duration missions. SAME will provide quantitative data on the sensitivity of these detectors to reduced gravity smokes that will allow evaluation of the adequacy of these existing technologies using relevant data. The current Fire Prevention, Detection, and Suppression (FPDS) program plan allows for the re-evaluation of future sensor technology, to allow new technology and capability to be utilized. The results from SAME are needed to provide the reduced gravity baseline data against which future detection technology developments can be evaluated. The smoke detectors developed from the results of SAME can also be useful in other extreme environments on Earth, such as submarines or underwater laboratories. Accurate detection of smoke in these environments can save lives.

Publications

6 listed in PSI, 3 with a DOI.

  1. Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-2: Comparison of Flight Experiment Results with Ground Test ResultsMeyer Marit E., Urban David L., Ruff Gary A., Mulholland George, Yuan Zeng-guang, Bryg Victoria, Cleary Thomas, Yang Jiann
  2. Evaluation of Low-Gravity Smoke Particulate for Spacecraft Fire DetectionD Urban, G Ruff, G Mulholland, M Meyer, ZG Yuan, T Cleary, J Yang, P Greenberg, V Bryg
  3. Particle Morphology and Size Results from the Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-2Urban David, Ruff Gary, Greenberg Paul, Fischer David, Meyer Marit, Mulholland George, Yuan Zeng-guang, Bryg Victoria, Cleary Thomas, Yang Jiann
  4. Preliminary Results from the Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment - ReflightD Urban, G Ruff, M Meyer, T Cleary, J Yang, G Mulholland, ZG Yuan, V Bryg
  5. Detection of Smoke from Microgravity FiresDL Urban, D Griffin, G Ruff, T Cleary, J Yang, G Mulholland, ZG Yuan
  6. Evaluation of spacecraft smoke detector performance in the low-gravity environmentMeyer Marit E., Urban David L., Mulholland George W., Bryg Victoria, Yuan Zeng-Guang, Ruff Gary A., Cleary Thomas, Yang Jiann

Hardware and raw data

6.3 GB of raw data on PSI: reports 1, raw data 223, analyzed data 86, presentations 4, reference data 2, science documents 2, engineering documents 24. FlameLens reads the experimental table, not the raw video or sensor files.

Linked investigations

On Earth

Smoke detection: Particle-size data for early, pre-flame smoke supports better smoke detector design.

“can lead to technology for an advanced fire detector”